Economic Calendar


Live Economic Calendar Powered by Forexpros - The Leading Financial Portal

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Market trades in sideways

Though Market looks weak and choppy still holding high due to falling rupee only. Careful and trade cautiously.
Strategy will be selling on every rise but hold the positions with proper MTM and you'll be high profit...

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Modulated depreciation is salutary: S.S. TARAPORE





The RBI should sell dollars from its reserves only to smooth out sharp volatility in the rupee, but not fight a fundamental exchange rate adjustment.
The dollar-rupee exchange rate has been the centre of attention in the recent period. Top policymakers have been advocating defence of the present exchange rate and they are opposed to any further depreciation. The stemming of the rupee rate from further depreciation is implicitly based on the premise that the present exchange rate is viable and can be easily defended.
To assess the viability of the present dollar-rupee exchange rate, it is necessary to review the external payments position of India. The balance of payments current account deficit (CAD) in 2011-12 is estimated to be well over 4 per cent of GDP.
While we could, with bravado, dismiss the international rating agencies downgrading of India, there is no gainsaying that the lower rating would eventually reduce the confidence of investors, and unless we take strong remedial action, we could well see an unprecedented exodus of capital.
India's inflation rate has been, for quite some time, well above that in other emerging market economies (EMEs). The hope that our inflation rate will be on the downtrend is an article of faith. The overall political economy situation also does not generate confidence for foreign investors.

Fall in forex reserves

The foreign exchange reserves, which provided considerable comfort to investors, are now showing some signs of stress. With the volume of transactions rising rapidly, the forex reserves have fallen over the peak. The forex reserves are now equivalent to only 88 per cent of the external debt.
Furthermore, the short-term debt is 40 per cent of total external debt. A large part of the short-term debt comes up for refinancing in the period up to September 2012 and it is unlikely that refinancing will be possible at reasonable rates of interest.
In the recent period, the Reserve Bank of India has gone into overdrive to defend the rupee. These measures are reminiscent of the 1990s when administrative measures were taken to support the rupee. In the recent period, exporters have been required to repatriate 50 per cent of export earnings. Those holding Export Earners Foreign Currency (EEFC) accounts are expected to fully draw down their balances in these accounts before entering the forex market for purchases. Furthermore, controls have been imposed on forward market activity.
Top policymakers have explicitly pronounced that the forex reserves should be used to prevent any further depreciation.
Given the delicately balanced political economy situation, the authorities would not want critics pointing to the exchange rate management as being deficient. India Inc. has, all along, advocated a strong rupee or, in other words, cheaper imports. The adjustment then falls on the export sector. It bears stressing that export subsidy in terms of lower interest rates is an inefficient alternative to a reasonable exchange rate.

Exchange rate adjustment

Advocates of a strong rupee would claim that we have experienced a sustained increase in productivity while the rest of the world is lagging. Such ideas stir our macho spirits but are dangerous as they can lead to inappropriate exchange rate policies.
Now what can one make of the recent exchange management? In terms of the 6 currency real effective exchange rate (REER), the rupee appreciated by 19.5 per cent between September 2009 and July 2011, and then depreciated by 10.4 per cent between August 2011 and March 2012; the exchange rate depreciation in April and May 2012 probably implies that the appreciation up to July 2011 has been clawed back.
Ideally, the RBI's policy should be to aggressively buy when the rupee is appreciating excessively and sell when the rupee is depreciating excessively. Refraining from purchases on the upswing of the rupee but expending the reserves on the downswing would, over time, deplete the reserves.

Inflation rate differentials

If one wishes to move away from the REER, then the nominal dollar-rupee rate could be tracked over a longer period.
In March 1993, when the dual exchange rate was given up and a unitary market-determined rate was introduced, the rate stabilised for quite some time at $1= Rs 31.37.
Given that the secular inflation rate in India is at least 4 per cent per annum higher in India than in the US, the exchange rate should reflect relative inflation rate differentials and the exchange rate should now be around $1= Rs 66. Talk of a depreciation of the rupee to Rs 66 would be considered as blasphemy in official circles as also by India Inc.
If we want to avoid fundamental distortions in the economy, one of the prerequisites would be an appropriate exchange rate.
One recognises the danger of self-fulfilling prophecies, but the least the RBI should do in the immediate future would be to smooth out sharp volatility, but not fight a fundamental exchange rate adjustment.
To that extent, the RBI should intervene strongly by purchase in the forex market when the rupee appreciates, but undertake limited sales only to avoid excessive depreciation.
The problem is that political economy considerations would not allow the appropriate exchange rate adjustment to take place.
This could be unfortunate as monetary policy cannot bear the burden of fiscal imbalances as well as a fundamental disequilibrium in the exchange rate. In the absence of effective policy adjustment, India would face a sharp increase in inflation and a lower growth rate. 


http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/s-s-tarapore/article3429055.ece





Market view

I feel market is in false breakout on upperside be cautious.
It may because of rupee slide further.
It is expected that rupee may fall to 66per $ as per SS Tarapore (Retd.Deputy Governor of RBI). 

Update on Sell NaturalGas @145.20-40 SL 147.1 T140

NG made a low of 142.9 and then our stoploss of 147.1 triggered.

Those who are holding the short can short one more lot here@ 150.2-150.5 for a target of 147.5 by opening and our positional target is intact of 140

SEll Silver Target Achieved made low of 53873

Silver made a low of 53905

Silver made a low of 53905

Sell CRUDE @5142-5148 SL 5175 T 5120/ 5103 !st target achieved

Sell CRUDE @5142-5148 SL 5175 T 5120/ 5103  1st target achieved

Monday, May 21, 2012

Sell NaturalGas @145.20-40 SL 147.1 T140

Sell NaturalGas @145.20-40  SL 147.1  T140

Sell CRUDE @5142-5148 SL 5175 T 5120/ 5103

Sell CRUDE @5142-5148   SL 5175 T 5120/ 5103

Sell SILVER @54200-54250 SL 54500 T 53900

Sell SILVER @54200-54250  SL 54500 T 53900

Sell Gold @29000-29050 Sl 29150 T 28500

Sell Gold @29000-29050 Sl 29150 T 28500

Bigger threat to global economy than Greece!

The global economy is in a pretty fragile state at the moment. And everyone seems to have turned their attention towards Greece. However, a certain Dr Marc Faber believes that there's a more dangerous threat lurking on the horizon. And it answers to the name of China. "I think the biggest risk is actually China because if you look at Greece, it's an insignificant economy," Faber is believed to have said to a business channel.

Faber backs up his thoughts with some hard data. He argues that China is the single largest contributor to global economic growth. Quite certainly so. As per the IMF, the dragon nation's contribution to world's GDP growth during 2010-13 had been to the tune of 31%, up from just 8% in the 1980s. Thus, it can be easily concluded that a slowdown in China will have a significant trickledown effect on world GDP growth.

Things have certainly not deteriorated in China overnight. Its bubble of overinvestment has been building up for quite some time. The very policies that held the dragon nation in good stead in the last decade or so are now coming back to haunt its economy. Chief amongst them would be its tendency to keep exchange rates intact and setting interest rates lower than inflation. What these policies have ended up doing is that they have created massive capacities, most of which are now lying underutilised and even running into huge losses. Obviously, these are proving to be a big drag on its economic growth as evident from the first quarter 2012 GDP growth, its weakest in three years.

Thus, if China doesn't get down to setting things right, it could see a long period of below par GDP growth and would also affect the GDP growth of a large number of nations dependent on it. Another more serious outcome could be a hard landing where a sharp downward spike could make matters even worse for the global economy. Thus, as can be seen, a slowing China is a much bigger threat to the global economy than the problems currently underway in Greece. Investors could do well to keep this factor in mind while making their investment decisions. 


http://www.equitymaster.com/5MinWrapUp/detail.asp?date=05/19/2012&story=5&title=Heres-a-bigger-threat-to-global-economy-than-Greece

Warren Buffett`s best metric for market valuation

Legendary investor Warren Buffett calls this ratio as "probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment". His disdain for macroeconomics is legendary. But even he is willing to relax his otherwise strict stance on macroeconomics just for this one ratio that has a country's GNP (Gross National Product) as one of its key components. The ratio is nothing but the total market cap of all the companies listed in an economy to that economy's GNP. Over the years, this ratio has done a very good job of determining long-term returns that an investor can expect from the stock markets .
Infact, in an article that appeared in the popular magazine, Fortune, somewhere at the turn of the century, Warren Buffett had used this ratio extensively. He used the ratio to arrive at the conclusion that despite a steep fall in the US markets in the aftermath of the tech bubble, US stock markets were far from being cheap and over the next decade or two, investors would be making a mistake if they expect stock market returns to exceed the 7%-8% range.
Today, more than seven years after he wrote the article, S&P 500, one of the major US stock market indices is actually down 27%, a negative CAGR of 4%. Hence, for his 7%-8% returns theory to come good, US stock markets will have to actually rise more than 7%-8% over the next few years. And there are good chances that these returns could be achieved. We say so because just a few months back, when Fortune calculated the market cap to GNP ratio, it stood at a reasonable 70%-80%. To put things in perspective, at its peak in March 2000, the ratio stood at a mindboggling 200%, prompting Buffett to significantly downgrade the returns that investors were expecting from stock markets over the next decade or two.
The numbers mentioned above could have surely created a few doubts in our mind. Allow us to clear them. A country's GNP could be thought of as revenues of one big business and the country's market cap nothing but the value that investors are willing to assign to that business. Over time, everything else remaining constant, both the market cap as well as GNP should grow at a similar rate. But that is not the case. At times, market cap grows at a faster rate than GNP but it cannot continue doing so for ever. Thus, when the ratio becomes unsustainable or unrealistic, market cap falls adjusting to the new reality. As per Buffett, if the ratio is in the region of 70% - 80%, buying stocks are likely to work well over a long-term period. Of course, this is not to say that the ratio cannot go lower but we believe that one should start buying stocks if the ratio achieves the above mentioned threshold and keep buying if it falls further.
Picking up on this theme, one of the popular value-investing websites has actually come out with a table that lays out the various scenarios for the ratio and what do they effectively mean for the overall market valuation as a whole.








As can be seen, the range that Buffett talked about i.e. the 70%-80% range indicates that the markets are somewhere between moderate valuation and fair valuation. If the ratio exceeds 115% as it did in late 1990s and most of this decade, the markets are in the overvalued zone where odds of investing are not in the favor of investor from a long-term perspective.











Source: Ace Equity, Government of India
Assuming that a similar approach works in India as well, where do we stand currently and how has been our historical performance? The chart shown above could give us some idea. As can be seen, the ratio came within striking distance of touching the significantly overvaluation zone somewhere in 2007-08 and the market has significantly pulled back since then. Assuming an advanced estimate of GNP by the Government of India, the ratio currently stands at 66% (BSE 500  market cap/GNP), indicating that the markets could be in the moderately undervalued zone. Thus, from a long term perspective, markets are definitely looking attractive.
The fact that the ratio has gone as low as 31% few years back does make even the current levels look expensive. However, it should be noted that Indian economy seems to have moved to a higher growth trajectory of the order of 7%-8% and hence, there is very little chance that market cap to GNP ratio of 30% will ever be seen again.
Thus, taking all of this into account, it may not be a bad idea to start building exposure to equities with a long term horizon in mind.

http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/market-outlook/warren-buffett39s-best-metric-for-market-valuation_707276.html#toptag



Equitycalls

STOCKS TO BUY            
SCRIP NAME (NSE CODE) PREVIOUS  CLOSE BUY AT/ABOVE   STOP LOSS TARGET 1 TARGET 2 TARGET 3 TARGET 4
BOMDYEING 447.10 451.56 446.27 456.66 462.02 467.41 472.83
STOCKS TO SELL            
SCRIP NAME (NSE CODE) PREVIOUS CLOSE SELLAT/BELOW  STOP LOSS TARGET 1 TARGET 2 TARGET 3 TARGET 4
ACC 1145.10 1139.06 1147.52 1131.21 1122.81 1114.45 1106.12          www.technicalanalysisofstocks.in    

Precious Metals Market Manipulation? By Doug Casey, Casey Research

For many years now, a meme has been floating around that the prices of gold and silver are being manipulated, which is to say suppressed, by various powers of darkness. This is not an unreasonable assertion. After all, the last thing the monetary powers-that-be want is to see is the price of gold skyrocketing. That would serve as an alarm bell, possibly panicking people all over the world, telling them to get out of the dollar. It’s assumed, by those who believe in the theory, that the US Treasury is behind the suppression scheme, in complicity with a half-dozen or so large bullion banks that regularly trade in the metals.
The assertion is bolstered by the fact that governments in general, and the US in particular, are always intervening in all kinds of markets. They try to control the price of wheat and corn with various USDA programs. They manifestly manipulate the price of credit (interest rates), now keeping it as low as possible to stave off financial collapse. And they may well be active, through the so-called Plunge Protection Team, in propping up the stock market. They were largely responsible for the boom in property, through numerous programs and parastatals like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Why, therefore, shouldn’t they also be involved in the monetary metals? Central banks regularly intervene in (i.e., manipulate) each others’ currencies. So it’s not unreasonable to imagine they’d try to manipulate gold as well.
In fact, the US and other governments did try to suppress the gold price from 1961 to 1968 through what was known as the London Gold Pool. The US alone persisted in trying to do so until Nixon devalued the dollar and closed the gold window in 1971.
But if it was ever doable, that was the time. Although nobody knows exactly how much gold there is above ground, a reasonable guess might be six billion ounces. There was a possibility of controlling the price, in the days of the London Gold Pool, when there were only three billion ounces in existence and when all the gold in the world was worth only $105 billion ($35 x 3 billion = $105 billion).
Today, however, the value of the world’s gold is around $10 trillion ($1,650 x 6 billion = $10 trillion), nearly 100 times as much. And governments own about a billion ounces, only 16% of it, whereas the last time they tried to control the price they owned about 1.1 billion ounces, which was about 35% of the world supply. And the governments, their central banks and almost all large commercial banks are bankrupt; they have vastly less financial power than they did in the days of the London Gold Pool. Why would they try to do something that’s so obviously a losing game?
I’m not at all disinclined to believe tales of manipulation of markets by the state; I expect it, and as a speculator I relish it. But I like to see evidence for everything. And extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. I’ve read the stuff these guys have written for years and have seen nothing but strident assertions and accusations. I’m completely willing to believe central bankers are capable of any kind of nefarious foolishness, but I’d like to see proof. I’m constantly reading assertions of how “the boys” come along at “precisely” 1p.m. or 2 p.m. or perhaps “precisely” 11:37 a.m. or 12:16 p.m. and, on a purely not-for-profit basis, decide to “smack down” the market for gold or silver or both. Meanwhile the market has been hitting new highs for a dozen years.
As you might imagine, I know most of the believers in the precious metals manipulation theories personally and am only a phone call or email away from those I don’t know. And I’m curious. So I ask questions of these folks, who are generally intelligent, well informed and sophisticated. But I don’t get answers that I find make sense. There have been readily identifiable reasons for other government manipulations in the past. It’s obvious why a government wants low interest rates. It’s obvious why they want high real estate and stock markets. But why – in today’s world – would they really want to spend billions keeping gold (or especially silver) down? You’d think they might have tried to control the price of uranium when it ran to $140 a few years ago. Or perhaps the price of sugar when it ran to 28 cents last year; everybody uses sugar.
Despite the fact that gold can act as an alarm bell, few Americans – or anyone, for that matter – among the hoi polloi care or even know the stuff exists except as an academic matter. Suppressing the gold price is not only vastly harder but much less important than it was during the last market.
Here are some questions I’d like answered:
Q: Why do these banks (JPMorgan, etc.) even give a damn, in the first place, what the price of the metals might be?
The only reason that makes any sense is that they are acting as proxies for the US Treasury; the Treasury doesn’t go into the markets itself. But does it direct a commercial bank to act for it to buy or sell gold? It might. But there’s zero proof of any sort it’s doing that.
These banks have no dog in the fight; they couldn’t care less what the metals prices are and have no reason to try manipulating the market.
Q: Why has there been zero word from their traders about how stupid their bosses are for fighting a gigantic 10-year bull market? These guys all know each other, and they gossip with the same delight as teenage girls.
It’s hard to keep a long-term illegal collusion a secret. Two parties might possibly be able to keep a secret. But six or eight commercial banks acting in broad daylight? It’s said that three individuals can keep a secret, but only if two of them are dead. But for a half-dozen trading operations to do so? Wall Street is the world’s greatest rumor mill. But there’s never been a rumor (outside of those created in conspiracy circles, who offer no sources) that the bullion banks are acting, in concert or individually, as agents of Timmy Geithner.
Q: If, as alleged, these banks have been short gold from the bottom of the gold bear market at $255 in 2001 and the silver bear market at $4.25, also in 2001, how can they possibly absorb tens or hundreds of billions of losses? Did they expect to take the metals to a fraction of their 1971 lows?
Trading desks make mistakes. But they don’t stay short in one of history’s great bull markets – it’s not the way traders earn bonuses. How stupid are the supposed “not for profit” sellers of gold supposed to be?
Q: Exactly where and how do they supposedly get the capital to cover these losses? Haven’t they ever heard the old saw, “He who sells what isn’t his’n must give it back or go to prison”? No bank can tie up billions in capital fighting the market for a decade.
Q: Exactly who originated this idea of trying to suppress prices using the futures markets?
Here a well-known writer on this subject suggested the following to me, via an email, when I asked: “The big commercials, starting some 25 years ago, discovered they could dominate the market and force technical traders in and out of the market when they wished at great profits to the commercials. But they miscalculated and stayed in too long, and now they are trapped.”
I don’t buy that explanation for several reasons. Of course the big guys, like commercials, are always bullying small speculators. The small guys use technical trading systems, which make it easy to figure out where they’re buying and selling. Small traders are always minutes behind the market. And small traders usually use way too much margin, so they’re prone to being squeezed and panicked. This has always been true, not just for the last 25 years. It’s part of why small traders are notorious for losing. The commercials are typically on the other side of the trade.
But one thing is for certain: nobody (certainly not commercials) allows himself to get in so deep he’s trapped for 12 years in one of history’s greatest bull markets.
Q: Why fight the market, and get trapped, in just gold and silver? Why aren’t they trying to suppress copper, platinum and palladium as well? For that matter, every commodity?
I don’t credit the people who run central banks or national treasuries with a great deal of financial acumen; they’re basically just political hacks, flunkies that went to “good” schools, dress well and like feeling important in a safe niche in the bureaucracy. But they don’t want to lose their jobs by being that wrong for that long.
Q: Why would the US Treasury (if it’s behind a gold suppression scheme) make things easier for the Chinese, the Russians, the Indians and numerous other developing countries by suppressing the gold price? They simply take advantage of the lower price to buy more.
The arguments for suppression of gold make very little sense when you examine them. The arguments for silver make absolutely no sense at all; it’s a tiny market that nobody cares about except for silver fanatics, who treat it like a religious icon. That said, I’m at least as bullish on silver as gold – but a discussion of that will have to wait.
If anyone could answer these questions, I’d appreciate it. I advise readers to buy gold – even at current levels – but I’d like to see them do it for the right reasons. And it seems to me the arguments about gold manipulation are more redolent of religious belief than economic reasoning.



INDIA'S KONDRATIEFF CYCLE : And its impact on the Indian Stock markets and Asset markets. The 70 year financial cycle surrounding business cycles.

The Kondratieff [Kf] cycle or waves are the brainchild of Nikolai Dmyitriyevich Kondratyev. Ian Gordon is the most active follower of the Kf cycle on the US markets and his writings are found at www.longwavegroup.com . To simply read the basics about the theory visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Kondratiev Dont miss the video presentation on the subject on our home page. Ever since I started studying the wave theory I have been exposed to the Kf cycle. It has taken me long to understand the context in which the cycle is to work because originally it appeared more like a study of inflation and deflation, and most of us think inflation is defined as a rise in prices. EWI and Robert Pretcher have made the point amply clear enough that changes in prices of goods and services is a by-product of inflation and deflation. Inflation refers to the expansion of monetary supply through printing of currency or through the expansion of credit or debt in the economy. Deflation therefore is the reduction of credit and debt or money supply. Before I shows you some charts here is some background.
N.D.Kondratyev noted that once economic activity stats expanding the financial system starts to expand. Business ideas needing to grow look out for funding or money for their activities and this forms the beginning of the Kf cycle. Credit is used to fund expand and grow business existing and new. But as the need to grow and compete grows man starts using debt to profit from the expansionary trends rather than new ideas. This greed causes bubbles. At some time debt becomes so big that it cannot be financed or serviced any more and defaults start to happen and a deflationary cycle starts. Deflation continues to most credit is destroyed and it takes years to restore confidence for the whole cycle to start again. The expected time span of the cycle is between 60-70 years. However its not a time cycle.  
This cycle has become the object of concentration of many of the prophets of doom since the 90s as they have been predicting the end of a 70 year cycle that started for the US in 1935-49 after its last known deflationary depression. That its such a long term cycle many were too early to predict it and this bubble ended up being bigger than many in the past. The reason for this is that a bubble in credit/debt can continue as long as there is cheap finance available to keep funding or refinancing the existing debt. Also inflation needs to stay under control as long as monetary expansion continues. Once a lot of debt has already been built up to avoid the unwinding process you would always try to hang onto it by finding new financing options. The bursting of a bubble would occur due to natural consequences once options run out as they did in 2007 for the US, but they can also be burst by social or ecological factors like war, famine, earthquakes, volcanoes or something that is big enough to overwhelm the current level of economic activity making debt default the only option. So the US went into deflation in 1929 when its debt to GDP ratio was 140-160%, in 2007 it went up to 400%. Different countries around the world have deflated at different levels of debt, and a lot depends on the domestic and external environment. Today India's debt to GDP is above 150%[public+private] and not many want to accept the possibility of deflation in India because we believe that debt can be refinanced from the high savings like Japan has done for years, to keep the deflation from causing an economic depression. However the global economic environment is not favorable anymore and its effects in a globalised economy cannot be ignored. If savings are diverted to finance credit of the government than industry might get started and vice versa. If interest rates are lowered a lot then inflation becomes a risk, unless cheaper imports are available [read strong currency]. So lots of room for imbalance. 
The Kf cycle also has been often misunderstood as a time cycle so the exactness with time i.e. 50-70 years is not exacting however history has seen these cycles hover around this time frame. The essence of the cycle lies in the flow of events from one to the other with the same results. Being a generational event that is its size is similar to mans life expectancy the next generation does not relate with its presence that easily and it continues to repeat with the same manifestations as long as we follow the existing economic models. The US is in its 4th Kf cycle since the 18th century.
The Kf wave also needs to be read in the context of the Elliott Wave Principle, the 5-3 pattern at that degree of trend. Recent research by EWI on socionomics shows how the wave patterns of the stock market are associated with social trends. And it is the social mood that determines whether economic activity will expand or contract as people feel better or worse about themselves. So the Elliott wave pattern reflects economic activity that is the lifeblood of an expanding or contracting Kf cycle over 70 years. Therefore a deflation becomes more severe once it starts as social mood turns negative and social behavior forces us deeper into a corrective mode. It forces new change to correct the mistakes of the past before another positive cycle can emerge and it shows up in a bear market in the form of a 3 wave decline.
Now that's a lot of theory so here are some charts. And what is happening to India!

The first chart I am showing is that of the Sensex picked up from Vivek Patil's reports as it back dates the Sensex based on the RBI index and the FE index. This chart gives us more than 70 years of data to fit the Indian Kf cycle. Since India started its first cycle post independence it may be fair to assume that we are in wave 1 of a supercycle degree bull market and the coming bear market will be wave 2 of supercycle degree. Note my wave counts are based on R. N. Elliott's methodology and not Glenn Neely's Neowave so it will differ from those followers. The Kf cycle discussed by Ian Gordon is often discussed in the form of 4 seasons to explain how it is unfolding, and they are like this.
The Kondrateiff seasons and India
 
Kf Spring - Spring represents the birth of an economy which for India would have started a little before  or around Independence. Spring is the bull market during which the economy grows on new found growth prospects to exploit all its resources. Interest rates start on a low base and trend higher as demand for money grows to fund growth. Prices of assets commodities and labor expand. For India the time up to 1990 would represent such a period. GDP compounded at 6% during this period.
Kf Summer - Summer is when the economy reaches full bloom. All resources are being exploited and the expansionary phase of the past results in visible price inflation catching up with wages. To control it, interest rates move up substantially often slowing down the economy. By the end of Spring price inflation will eventually appear to have been controlled and interest rates can go lower again. 1994-2001 represents such a period in India. 1966-1981 represents the same for the US. For those who have been following the market for the last decade you will remember how analysts were often comparing the 70's Dow chart with the 90's India chart to predict how the Dow then took off later and went up 10 fold over the next 20 years [during the Kf Autumn]. Well India went up 8 times since 2001 in 7 years. What I want to highlight is that in terms of the Kf cycle they were comparing the same state of markets [Kf summer]. The outcomes therefore were also similar, but time wise one lasted much longer. There is a belief therefore that India's bull market that started in 2001 is going to last for decades and we are seeing a temporary halt right now, however the size of the bull market is often ignored. Time was smaller in India because we quickly went from a closed to open economy and are doing a very fast catch up job with lost time. In terms of wave structure too if you see the chart above wave 3 was the longest however wave 1 was a small bull market relatively, and therefore wave 5 equals wave 1 in size and that is good enough. India's debt to GDP was just over 50% by the end of the Summer].
Kf Autumn - The myth that inflation is under control is what kicks off the Autumn. This feeling of control allows for monetary action to start again. Note that this is the only time when lower interest rates are associated with rising asset prices. During spring interest rates start on a small base and expand slowly as the economy expands, demand for finance leads interest rates. During Autumn rates are lowered to kick start economic activity and the belief that prices can be kept under control allows for credit based bubbles to reach full scope. Falling rates push all asset prices up from equities bonds and real estate to possibly commodities and wages. As credit levels expand exponential nurturing debt with cheap finance is the essence of keeping the Autumn bubbles alive. But as discussed above they will eventually burst. 2001-2010 is the Autumn for India. In terms of credit 2010 appears like the right time of the cycle to end, though from a stock market perspective it can be debated whether the 5th wave based on Elliott waves ended in 2008 or 2010. It differs between Sensex and Nifty. India's debt to GDP had crossed 135% and is now close to 140% This excludes items like NBFCs, non banking FDs, non banking corporate debt, derivatives markets and other lenders and borrowers. Bank credit and Govt debt along add up to close to 140%. If we put everything together it could shoot past 150%
Kf Winter - As always winter will come. The most painful period as bubbles burst causing economic upheavals and hardship. Fear and distrust force reduced lending activity despite lower interest rates. Quality debt is back in vogue. The process of unwinding of debt before another cycle starts can take from a few years to decades depending on the degree. The U.S. deflation from 1929-1949 took 15 years for debt, but stock markets bottomed in 1934, i.e. in 4 years. However a grand super cycle occurs when a 5 wave rally of one larger degree occurs. This means after 3 consecutive Kf waves in a country it completes a larger degree 5 wave rise lasting 210 years and will correct/consolidate for a longer period. In the U.S. 1720-1784 is shown as the Grand-Supercycle degree wave 2 by Robert Prechter in his book "Prechter's Perspective". That was 50-60 years of depression/consolidation. Since then US has been in a Grand supercycle degree wave 3 till year 2000. Wave 4 could potentially be as large in time. But for countries like India that are in their first Kf cycle since independence and things are not so bad. Yes I think India will see its own Kf winter, i.e. deflation or depression, however after 2-3 years once it completes a supercycle degree wave 2 correction, a larger degree supercycle wave 3 bull market lasting 70 years can emerge. This is when decoupling will happen for India and maybe China. The recent 2010 Indian budget has started talking about reducing the fiscal deficit and that is a deflationary trend signal. How debt gets reduced may vary from cycle to cycle. Bubbles can be pricked internally through tightening or externally through events not in our control.
 
Now that I have given enough perspective to the Kf cycle and where India is placed within it lets discuss the impact on India and the stock market. it is my belief that India will find it hard to escape the Kf winter that is likely to follow. As India was late to enter the Global Kf-Autumn, it will has taken time to enter the Kf winter. One of the reasons that India's cycles are years apart from the west is that we were a closed economy but since the 80's we started the process of opening up. In 1991 we jumpstarted the process with reforms and have been catching up very fast with the world cycle. So while the Indian Summer occurred 10 years after the US summer ended, our winter is now starting 3 years later. 2010 shall mark the beginning of India's Kf winter of deflation and depression as the external environment starts to worsen. Attempts to finance its own fiscal deficit internally might stress the economy and attempts at price inflation will lead to dumping of goods by other nations or social revolt. Raising interest rates will lead to reduced lending and if we try diverting savings to finance the government the corporate sector will starve. So we are walking a tight rope which will break more due to external factors than domestic ones. Non financial problems like the one with our neighbors can also be a hidden trigger. Basically our high fiscal deficit and 140% debt/GDP is now exposed to various external risks that can stall further monetary expansion and thus force a period of deflation before we can start growth all over again. India's biggest strength that will eventually bring us out of this mess is our demographics. A young population is willing to take hard steps and suffer the pain needed to quickly move ahead. Ageing populations in the west and Japan prefer not to suffer pain and postpone it as far as possible which will make them take much longer [20 years for Japan already]. Now here is a look at the current picture of the Elliott Wave structure for the Sensex for the last decade
Elliott Waves and the Markets - counts updated to 05/2012

If you have watched the economy since the 90's you will appreciate why 94-01 was a Kf summer. The business cycle turned down when India's debt to GDP was only 50%. So overcapacity in some sectors was enough to plague us for years. Interest rates for lower rated corporates were over 20%, and the FD market exploded due to the cash crunch. It took years before interest rates fell again and inflation was controlled and a new business cycle emerged. Also note how social mood turned down, from the music industry losing its charm to coalition governments becoming the norm were changes in social trends. During this phase you had sector bull runs from time to time but no broad based bull market. While the Sensex remained above 2800 stocks lost upto 50-80% due to the contraction. Defensives [fmcg and pharma] and technology stocks were the best performers.
I have already explained that 2001-2010 was the Kf Autumn, within this the 5th wave of the stock market advance from 2001 ended in 2008 after which it is technically in a bear market. However some sectors like Autos and IT are completing their 5th waves in 2010 as the B wave in the Sensex is forming. If you have been an Indiacharts follower then you would know that I was originally counting the fall in 2008 as a 5 wave decline. At some point I choose to follow the W-X-Y-X-Z structure as it allowed me to truncate the bear market at 8000 on low sentiment readings. My expectation then was of an X wave upto not more than 12500. However we have a B wave that is much larger. That alternate played its role then and allowed me time to judge whether my original counts that have longer term bearish implications are valid and whether economic behavior is fitting. Now its more clear that decoupling is a fad. Its possible only after a deflation. It takes a new model of growth to emerge may be new technologies that solve the worlds problems or make it more productive. All said and done the original wave structure of counting the 2008 bear market as a wave A decline has not been violated and the falling volumes and bubble in small caps is a clear signal that the recent Nov'2010 high is a wave B top of a supercycle degree bear market. Wave C of the bear market therefore will be a 5 wave decline and has already started. Wave C has already begun and is splitting. Wave C would be at least equal to wave A giving the Sensex a target of 7627. Alternatively its possible for a mutiyear bear market to unfold in a complex W-X-Y-X-Z format with each bear market being a W/Y/Z and each bear market rally an X lasting for years. The choice of pattern will depend on how we choose to unwind our past excesses slowly and painfully or fast and quickly. Demographics can offer a hint here. A young population like that of India would like to take the hit and get on with it and that is what our government or RBI should let happen. Trying to slow down the pain will only prolong it. I am not sure how demographics play a role here because out leaders are always in the higher age bracket, the only reason could be that governments mostly implement that which the public at large demands no matter how absurd, its not their role to do what they think but what the people agree to. For this reason blaming the government for everything that does not work is a false approach in market analysis though very tempting. But my point here was that chances of a deep correction quickly and unwinding of excess debt in the system is a higher possibility for us than a long extended multiyear pattern of range bound moves with big bull runs as X waves in between. Its also what I would like to see so that we can quickly get on with it to the next supercycle bull market. A prolonged consolidation would not only hurt business but also be frustrating for a young population and could lead to social unrest.
These predictions may sound impossible today as known fundamental theory practiced cannot predict it as it does not encompass socionomics [or socio-economics], mass psychology and social mood, or financial cycles based on macroeconomics like the Kf wave. However wave theory states that bear markets often travel up to the wave 4 low of the previous bull market at one lower degree under consideration. 2001-2008 involved an extended 5th so wave IV of the 5th wave hit a low of 8800 a point we have already visited once, however wave 4 of the 2001-2008 bull market was at 4227, and wave 4 of the 70 year bull market shown in the first chart above is at 2596. These targets appear absurd today but coincide with C=A [7627], 1.618 times A [at 5545] and 2.618 times A [at 3842] as potential targets if C was extended.
I don't know whether to say we should expect such low levels but the Elliott Wave Principle suggests it and till the market proves it wrong it might be better to be prepared for the above scenario till a better one is clearly emerging. Right now investors should be holding cash and protecting their cash in safe banks FDs or Central government securities. Buy dollars to hedge against a depreciation of the rupee if you have access to currency futures. And wait for a great investment opportunity that lies at the end. If you are a trader capable of building shorts they would be profitable. At some point of time once gold prices are much lower you might want to also own gold. At some point in future the governments around the world will again attempt to spend their way out of deflation and those attempts at inflation can cause commodity prices to rise or hyperinflation in some economies. Then one should own some gold. But right now its too early to buy.
03-05-2012 update - The original wave count was for Y down to be the largest leg, when posted in 2010. Since Jan 2012 I have been changing this and Y maybe the shorter leg. Z as shown above would now be the longest leg. Also Y is shown above to possibly rise to max the 6000 level but it truncated at the 61.8% retracement and is over. It is also lastly possible that we are still in Y down due to this truncation and Z has not started as yet. Y is then developing itself as a complex corrective or triple zig-zag that will get marked as W-X-Y-X-Z.
Alternative and More thoughts : based on feedback
Now like I said the forecast even at A=C is bad enough and frankly for most readers hard to believe. So lets discuss what alternates have been thrown at me. The most common one is that India because of its high savings rate and public sector will be able to keep fueling its expansion for several years and we may get a few more bubbles to possibly new highs before we can enter a corrective Kf winter like period. Before I discuss this lets look at this chart taken from Citigroup Global markets Asia Pacific report.

Now let me be very clear that I am not being an economic analyst. Technical analysis and the Elliott Wave theory form the basis of any forecast. So what is the role of the Kondratieff wave? While studying supercycle degree Elliott wave counts, the knowledge of the Kf wave allows for economic forecasting based on a non linear model. So what I am most convinced about is the wave Count discussed above and that the Kf cycle of 70 years coincides with the 5-3 supercycle trend of markets. Based on this typically the Kf summer coincides with a wave 4 formation at supercycle degree. And wave 5 up with the Autumn bull market. In this context what I would expect is that attempts to reflate the economy with spending could slow down Wave C into a larger time wise 5 wave decline where wave 2 of C would be another strong rally that will try to retest the recent highs. But since wave B is over its going to be difficult to do more than that. The chart below shows this pattern and how the economic cycle and wave supercycle wave counts coincide with each other.

Extending the Kf Autumn into more bubbles is theoretically possible but needs a positive external environment and no external shocks, and a solution to inflation and interest rates as they come back to haunt you at the end of an Autumn bull market. If by some means we are able to solve the inflation/interest rate puzzle then an Autumn bull market can bubble away for longer than normal to all time highs. This has been seen to happen only for countries with huge economic power like US in the current period. So for all our strengths and better demographics we are weak in many areas such as technology, food security, dependence on rain gods, threatening neighbors and a non-global currency. One look at the chart above tells you that in a world that is already in trouble over debt we rank only next to Greece. OUCH! but economists will tell you its not that bad because we have domestic savings to finance it. All the same we need to service our debts and that's a cost that will slow us down. Our Debt to GDP ratio was over 100% two years back based on rough estimates. It is now close to 140%, excluding items where data is not available. Government debt including states and external debt is close to 70% and banking sector credit to commercial sector is at over 65% so that adds up to 135%+. In Greece the problem is not just savings but that its part of the Eurozone and cant do the kind of creative financing we still can. So just the idea that we can take the risk of growing on debt is not good enough anymore the question is whether its worth the risk and will it bear fruit before some external threat pricks it. Right now the wave structure tells me that it shall not be possible to extend this debt cycle any further. I have also been questioned about the 70 year period. Its not an exact period but its between 50-70 years that in the past has taken for the full Kf cycle to play out. You have to study the stages of the credit cycle in more detail to figure that out. Also stock market peaks and troughs will not occur exactly at the end of a Kf Autumn/Winter based on economic data, there are lead lags. Again is it still possible that we are only in wave 2 bear market of a multi year bull market that wont go below 11500? Its possible but till there is evidence of that, the risk of a Kf winter is worth keeping note of and waiting for it to be ruled out.
Kondratieff and the Financial cycle - 3/05/2012
While the Kf cycle is affected by demographics and technology the impact of the financial cycle is the highest and so we will not look at financial data and India is placed in the financial cycle. Not that spring and autumn periods can extend due to technological advances and play a role in the structure and size of the move. Demographics are essential for the spending cycle of the generation that starts working and then enters the spending cycle which is an approximate 20 year cycle. However for the demographic cycle to kick in the financial cycle has to also be favorable. Technological cycles can cause wave extensions within a boom due to the related productivity gains that are associated with them.

The first chart that I have to start is courtesy the Ian Gordon, of The Longwave Group. This chart shows the interplay between 4 major components, interest rates, inflation and commodity prices and stock prices. Now you visually see what I explained earlier that interest rates peak in the spring of the supercycle degree wave count and then spike up at the end of the Autumn or after the Winter has started. That spike up usually pushes the economy over the cliff from its debt overhang and then it takes a long time to recover. However soon after the debt problems are out in the open interest rates decline and that allows for stock markets to find a bottom way ahead of the economic cycle. The timing of these events with the structure of the market is important as they dont always follow an exact pattern but coincide close to each other. Still its important to know whether you are past that point in debt and interest rates.
In Jan 2012 I made a presentation at ATMA that showed many of these data points for India and so lets look at these charts again.

The most important one and that which has everyone in the market paying attention is the interest rate cycle. When the market rallied in Jan most believed that the interest rate cycle has turned down. The chart above is that of the Ten year GSEC yield. Based on this interest rates have not topped yet. Note interest rates peaked in India's Kf summer during the 1990's near 15% for Bank FDs. The Gsec yield shown above shows it falling since and then its bouncing back since 2004 in what I have marked as a corrective A-B-C structure. This is the spike in yields that is putting pressure on our debt levels. That chart itself shows that the interest rate up cycle might not be complete as wave C should complete 5 waves up which is not clear. An expanding triangle might be forming till 9.4% or if C=A in a throw-over till 9.9%. After that rates will peak and start falling. The chart above is after the recent interest rate cuts. And just yesterday RBI raised rates on NRI deposits. So the recent cuts appear premature and don't reflect the real situation. We are at the inflection point where rates will spike up and peak and stock markets enter their final leg of a bear market. 
We are therefore at the inflection point where everything changes. The perception that all is well. The real trend in GDP growth and the real pressure points in the economy are revealed. The following crisis that will now emerge from this will put enough pressure on the system to push a new age of financial and economic reform unlike any in the past but that is after the crisis deepens. We are at the edge of the cliff where the crisis becomes reality. Note that stock market as always will move ahead of the trend. They will crash before the crisis and they will bottom when the crisis is widespread and fully understood. By the time real reforms happen stock markets will have already seen their low point. This should happen over the next 1-3 years. It could be faster but time is not the science here and like I said the stock market and economic data points are not likely to be correlated in the near term. It takes time to get people into a consensus on the right path forward after a crisis. It takes time for public mood to change from one period in time to the other after they suffer economic pain.

As also explained above as interest rates peak so does inflation bottom during the spring. Seen above the chart of the CPI [UNME] urban inflation was depressed in the late 90s up to 2005, rising a little in 2007, and taking off after 2008. Thus during 2001-2003 low rates and inflation create the feeling that we are in control of these two factors and that creates confidence among policy makers to expand credit and capital for growth without fear of the two. This creates the Autumn boom which historically always ends in a bubble and crisis followed by deflation or depression or both depending on the economy in question.

This next chart above shows India's debt to GDP on reported numbers of the two components i.e. government debt and banking credit. You will find it interesting to note that the government number is actually falling after 2005. However ratios can fool you. In the weeks prior to this years budget there were articles discussing it and giving credit to the government overlooking that the rate of growth of debt was actually higher. This is because of the use of nominal GDP which includes inflation in the calculation above. It also shows that the government has been de-leveraging and allowing private debt to grow. Sounds like a good thing. So why all this talk this year about crowding out of the corporate sector by the government in borrowing? Because high levels of private debt and interest rates are putting pressure on the corporate sector and because banks have slowed down credit growth at the instruction of the RBI to reign in inflation. But all this does not change the macro picture that we have a high debt to GDP ratio in the economy short of 140% not including other forms of debt than these two. At this point the only way the monetary cycle can keep expanding and aiding growth is therefore to lower interest rates and for that control inflation. Most economic winters started at ratios above 150% but how high the numbers can rise before a crisis depends on being able to control these two key numbers inflation and interest rates. As discussed elsewhere the US did it by pushing globalization and Europe by creating the Euro zone. What can India do today? And should it follow the same path?
Seeing how our financial system has been imitating the global financial model since 1992, I can only tell you that it would do us good to stop and change course however painful that is if we want to move ahead quickly to the next stage of growth. Look at it another way do we want to blow our bubble still bigger to their size knowing how its all ended there today? We are in the fortunate position to know the financial problems that the current model of working are causing and could take a lead in changing things. But its not easy for the reasons discussed above...social mood or public consensus on the way forward. For that reason we will have to visit a crisis of our own in any case before things change or improve or the cycle can turn up again. The good news is that the government has capacity to stimulate the economy in future when needed as its own debt to GDP ratio is low. That without financial restructuring could give us a good powerful bear market rally again like it did in 2009 at some point in the future and we need to keep an eye on that possibility. Such interventions can change the time that a Kf cycle takes to complete and what it goes through in the interim in relation to the stock market.
The Dow/Gold ratio is often used to measure the KF cycle as shown below for the Dow. Again courtesy Ian Gordon, of The Longwave Group. 

This measure should work for all markets then and so I quickly backdated gold price data using the usdinr and did a Sensen/Gold ratio and its quite an amazing chart. First the Gold chart in rupee terms from 1970

Now look at the Sensex/Gold ratio from 1978 that the Sensex exists. What you see below is that the bull for the ratio peaked in 2008 and the 2010 rally is stocks is significantly lagged by this ratio. As seen above the ratio often completes the entire cycle up to down at supercycle degree. Then if we are in a supercycle degree down cycle then the ratio must fall below the 0.17 neckline of the H&S like pattern for the ratio and head towards the lower end of the range closer to 0.03 before we are done here. I will continue to monitor this as time goes. It means that either stocks need to come down, or gold [in rupees] needs to go up, or both, for this to happen.

The The above analysis shows that the Kondratieff Autumn bull market ended in 2008 in economic terms even though it might have continued into wave 5 upto 2010 on the Nifty. It shows that the Kondratieff winter for India has started but the economy has still not passed the tipping point where sentiment turns extremely negative and eventually hope is lost. We maybe at the cliff where that downfall starts as interest rates spike up to their peak levels. Once the winter dawns value investing will be back in vogue.
NEW additions - 14/07/2011
Kf cycle extentions and Global Headwinds
In my lifetime I am experiencing the first Kf inflection point from an Autumn to a Winter, so for all the theory and the gut feel from the data above that we are where we are, my experience is limited to this one time event and phenomena, and its going to make a lifetime of a difference to my investment payoff for an entire generation. Maybe that is the one reason this cycle works it occurs only once in your lifetime and its expectation can never become a mass phenomena. And since no one has any living experience of it its hard to believe and digest for most as it forecasts changes of large financial magnitude that will affect lives for years ahead.
This is why I have to be careful and admit that Kf Autumns can extend under certain circumstances. But are there many examples in history? No! Some people say Debt in India is not a problem but still the US with only 135% debt to GDP in 1929 underwent the great depression. That raises the question did the US face a Kf winter in the 1930's of its own doing? It was not because of their economy sinking but because global forces were at work back then too. The Economic power house of the period before the 30's was Europe and that got into trouble. The cycle then too was global. Economists who have studied high levels of debt do not define any particular level of debt from where an economy gets into trouble, it happens once the level is high enough that servicing it is difficult from GDP growth. The Kf cycle that measure the expansion of debt along with interest rates and inflation allows us to see the point where the secondary bubble in debt develops after a Kf summer [Summer is when interest rates drop along with inflation and all seems to be under control]. The Elliott wave theory allows us to identify the Summer as a wave IV at supercycle degree and the start of the Autumn speculative bull market. Once the Autumn is over as bubbles are already in place its a collapse that inevitably follows.
Because of the great depression the efforts of governments to not repeat the follies of the past have now tried to postpone the eventuality of a debt collapse through the use of financial institutions designed to prevent or postpone a collapse of the system till a solution is found. As discussed an Autumn bull market builds on the back bone of two things low interest rates and low inflation. As long as this is true debt levels keep going up till a bubble develops in some part of the system. Active management can ensure that bubbles don't develop but then at some point servicing debt that is high requires an expanding GDP that can service it, Productivity gains and technological advancement have played that role in the past and for the US the debt is now close to 380% of GDP. The US with its knowledge of the past was able to keep inflation low through what I may call a global arbitrage, In other words Globalisation was used to arbitrage cost of production in industrial goods and then in services [manpower]. This globalisation of the Kf cycle allowed it to extend for another 15 years beyond the normal time period of the average cycle. This allowed the US in a unique position as the owner of the reserve currency system to keep interest rates low and service its expanding debt. In the 1920's one can draw the same analogy with the high debts in Britain during the peak of its empire as it colonised the world. While world trade did exist back then globalisation and single currencies had still not been explored. So when debts hit the cealing even the US that was best positioned as an economy at higher levels of debt was pulled down in a depression with the rest of the world. Its supremacy as the largest creditor nation did not become an advantage till its own Kf cycle started once again from the Spring, a new 70 year period of prosperity. I am explaining this in detail because many predictions for the US Kf Winter have gone wrong as they were made ahead of time and no one anticipated the above possibilities to an extension of the Autumn bull market that was also aided by huge technological advancements. I have seen reports that show that productivity gains from tech were actually nominal since the 90s, so more of the gains were from globalisation/arbitrage.
This discussion is important as India nears a debt level of 140% to GDP. At the end of a Kf Autumn the question is can the Autumn extend. Many fundamentally think that India and maybe even China can keep going. But Kf analysts would have to see it differently. That we as an economy have triggers for a bright future we are at levels where an extension in the Kf Autumn requires low interest rates and low inflation both to persist. Along with that as we have opened up our economy to globalisation we also need a sound global economic environment. Our situation and even more that of China therefore today is like that of the US in 1929, growth economies rearing to go, the biggest creditor nation [China] but a global Kf Winter headwind from the US and Europe and Japan. Like US had to pay the price of a depression before it could grow exponentially from 1940-2000 [stock market 1932-2008], we might also have to first pay the price of a Winter so that we can Spring into a period of undeterred growth. But to allow the intellectuals an opportunity on a extended bull market in India I want them to ponder on how under this environment can we keep both inflation and interest rates low for an extended period of time. If financial markets detect unabated demand for commodities from emerging markets they will drive up those prices for economic profit. Since we are the cheapest producers of the world we have no where else to go to do our own industrial or economic arbitrage. We dont own the worlds reserve currency or have an unlimited market for our debt to finance our long term needs. Thus our dependence on global money in the form of FDI/FII remains. The argument that a weak global economy would bring down commodity prices and lower our inflation is a flawed argument in a global market place. The impact of a global slowdown or recession on India would be significant as many of our companies are now global, and our finances are global.
The only middle path I can see is that of a muddle through global economy, that does not fuel demand too much neither slows down dramatically but allows us to keep expanding. That then leaves us with the basic domestic question about our own ability to absorb the huge amounts of money in our economy without price controls or currency controls. Blaming all inflation on global commodity prices appears like the easy way out. When the CRB index was at its lowest levels in 2009 CPI-UW was in double digits as shown in the chart below. There is no correlation between the two. Domestic inflation has been a function of nothing other than our own monetary phenomena. So expansionary policy at the current levels of economic activity going forward will continue to attract the wrath of price inflation. Without a solution to that interest rates cant be held far behind as we saw in the last financial year. It almost appeared that RBI would keep rates low for the sake of growth but was eventually forced to act. At 140% debt to GDP high interest rates will not allow the economy to sustain and attempts to keep growth high will result in high nominal GDP growth [read Real GDP+inflation], boosting tax revenues on the incremental gains but not offering any real growth. That leaves one argument from the bulls, "Indian are mature enough to accept higher inflation for the sake of higher growth". Really? I actually heard some of that a year back.

In other words in the past we have only seen Autumns extended by the dominant economy of the world, by means that few others can adopt. Japan managed a muddle through economy because it could choose a soft landing in the case of extended growth in other parts of the world. Today with most global triggers used up we would need a miracle to keep an Indian Autumn bull market going on for ever without an economic Winter of our own. Yes the day you can clearly see our ability to keep interest rates low, inflation low, and be unaffected by a global recession that day it will be possible. It might also be possible if we choose to inflate the economy anyway and let people pay the price of inflation through a rising cost of living. I hope I Have made my point.
Here is a statistic I recently came across - All but one economy defaulted on its debts when the debt to GDP crossed 150% and that exception was Great Britain at the peak of its empire that managed to hang on, as it was financed then by the USA. This goes back to the 1930s. Today USA is the one in the position of claiming a global empire but not any other. With our own Indian debt to GDP at close to 150% we are at risk whether you want to believe it or not. Yes research may show otherwise that among listed companies those in the Senses/Nifty don't suffer such high debt however we are discussing Macro-economics here and at that level we have a problem that will affect everyone directly or indirectly.
The subject of people not liking inflation or its hedge [equities] can be best measured by looking at what people are doing with their savings. RBIs annual report publishes the % of household savings going into equities including debentures and mutual funds UTI etc. The % data is shown on the chart below. It does not show much hope. The ratio if my memory serves me right peaked in 1992 close to the 20% mark, could not find it on RBIs site. If fell throughout the 90s. A famous Indian investor called the 2003 bull market on the theory that retail investors will come back. The bull market he got but not the retail investors. The chart below is clear with their disinterest. 2006-2008 for three years interest did come back but did not match the highs seen in 1992. It was quick to disappear and 2011 we ended negative. The recovery to Sensex 18,000 in 2010 saw the no touch only 4.6%. This compared with developed markets like USA where the ratio is 60%+.

India's supercycle Bull market?
India will actually witness a supercycle bull market only after it does a supercycle bear market along with the rest of the world. Only after that would it enter a 70 year bull market period when targets like a Sensex 50000+ would become an economic reality but till then we have to suffer the pain first is my best bet. By when would we see this bear market end and the next leg up begin. I will need to go into an updated wave count for India and time projections for that so here it is.
Updated long term wave count
I first thought of updating the chart above but then let me use a new one altogether so that you can see how patterns change in the use of Elliott waves in real life. In my original wave count I was considering the entire post 2009 rally as a wave B but now I am changing it to X. The characteristics remain the same but it opens up more possibilities. Here is why I considered it. The chart below shows what I expect to be a triangle formation since the high of Jan 2011. Now if the 2010 top was wave B wave C down after that would be a 5 wave decline. In that case we would now be in wave 2 sideways. But wave 2 is rarely a triangle, triangles are most often found in wave B. What does it mean?

It means that the 2008 low is W and the 2010 top is X and next leg down would be Y. Now a bear market can end in Y but larger degree bear markets I have always seen completing in Z so it could be a long drawn affair going all the way into 2016, with Y ending somewhere in 2012-13. Now the size of each leg may also wary and need not look exactly like below. Y could be smaller and Z bigger and X a triangle of some kind etc. But that the current decline is wave Y is now clearly forming as an A-B-C. This allows for more complex bear market formations than simple 5 down expected earlier.  Would wave Y itself become a more complex pattern with more subdivisions?, it obviously could. Now lets see why the year 2016 is important.

I have done very little work on time cycles so I will refer to experts. I have read a few pieces that point to 2016 and here is the best of them from Robert Prechters May 2011 Elliott Wave theorist, from Elliott Wave International. In that report he shows that not only does the 7 year cycle but the 33 and 16.9 year cycles also point to the year 2016. This is where a meaningful bottom would occur for that market. Now that since the US will get there in 3 more waves down [waves 3-4-5 of a 5 wave decline] it is possible that an inter market divergence occurs. It is possible that when wave 3 down bottoms India completes its bear market and when wave 5 down in panic is forming India is in wave 2 of a new supercycle bull market already. I have seen such divergences of US v/s India before. An example at cycle degree is when India bottomed after 9/11 at its lowest level in Sep 2001, the US completed wave Y of its post Y2K bear market and continued to fall in wave Z into Oct 2002 to new lows when India was making wave 2 of a its Kondratieff Autumn bull market. This phenomena can again repeat at a larger degree between 2013-2016. Otherwise we all bottom together in 2016 anyway. I think 2016 should be the outer time frame for any Indian supercycle degree bear market at this juncture, with possibility of it completing as early as 2013.

With this analysis I have given a price and time dimension to the India's Kondratieff winter bear market that we have already entered. The updated wave counts take into account the changes in the fractals of the market as they have unfolded up to now. My disbelief about how our inflation interest rate scenario can be managed at the current global debt to GDP ratios. And the need to trade the market accordingly.
Market Type and Seasonality for Traders
A little more on the last sentence. That I have established we are in a trading market and not a trending one. Even the bear market itself is unfolding in pieces as small as they get. This may be the reason why IVs are low and maybe they stay there for a prolonged period of time. In other words a slow and gradual unfolding of a downward trend can occur with lots of intermittent rallies and a larger X wave bull market period similar to that from Mar09- Nov10 at some point. We have already seen that a large part of this period involved markets moving not more than 5-8% in any direction so once you identify the market type and trade with tools needed for such a market and avoid being a buy and hold or sell and hold kind of trader you might do better, A few bigger moves may come once a year but if you take it in pieces you will put together the big one too. The technical tools for trending markets v/s trading ones are different, the same indicators work differently and sometimes you have to act on simple readings of extreme sentiment or over bought over sold to keep the profits. The markets move swiftly in your favor and then quickly against you again giving you no second chance to take an exit with a confirmed reversal. Once you get used to this market type it will come easily, the difficulty will be when the market type changes again. But I believe that wont be any time soon but that day we will miss the first big move before knowing what has happened. No trading system has been able to capture a change in market type and that will keep us from being gods and only playing with the odds.
Finally a word on seasonality. During the 90s, the Kf summer I noticed that markets followed a budget top, and October bottom cycle for years, but in 2002 something changed for the first time markets topped in Jan. Since then as the Kf Autumn began seasonality shifted to a Jan top to a May bottom with a temporary halt in Oct. This seasonality remained till 2009. Since 2009 as we enter the Kf winter I have now witnessed a new change, an Oct/Nov top and April/June bottoms, and a 2 month up down cycle at play. This new cycle should remain in play till the Kf Spring the next bull market emerges. Once should know that seasonality does invert between the bullish and bearish periods at times when a trend extends however the time periods remain. So from June 2011 we were in a bullish cycle till July then down in August and September. Positive for October. Note this is not normal but both last year and this year October saw a rally and a top near Diwali. Last 2 years top was on Diwali day a surprise but this year a day after Diwali just to fool the ordinary observation. The cycle is now down for November and December before a counter cyclical move in late Dec to Jan. Wave 3 down either ends by Dec or continues all the way into Feb similar to last years cycle.
03-05-2012 update - The seasonal pattern played out as above with the market making its low point a month earlier than the previous two years. The top in Feb too therefore was a month early. Since Feb however we are in the 3rd month counting for the next seasonal down leg to complete. The reason for this delay may therefore be attributed to a seasonal adjustment. What that means is that the time taken is the markets way of adjusting back to the original 2 month seasonal cycle that was prevalent since 2009. That usually meant a top in April and a two month decline into early June for a bottom. We are therefore into the final month where the current down leg should complete bye end of May or early June.
Get daily updates from Indiacharts by joining the group below

http://www.indiacharts.com/vwave/KFW.htm

Economic Calendar May 21 - May 25

May 21 - May 25 this week this month today
DateTime DetailActualForecastPrevious
Tue May 22 10:00amExisting Home Sales Detail  4.64M 4.48M
  10:00amRichmond Manufacturing Index Detail  1214
Wed May 23 10:30am Crude Oil Inventories Detail    
  10:00amNew Home Sales Detail   328K
  10:30am HPI m/m Detail   0.3%
Thu May 24 8:30amCore Durable Goods Orders m/m Detail   -0.8%
  10:30amNatural Gas Storage Detail    
  8:30amUnemployment Claims Detail    
  8:30amDurable Goods Orders m/m Detail   -4.0%
Fri May 25 9:55amRevised UoM Consumer Sentiment Detail    
  9:55amRevised UoM Inflation Expectations Detail    


source:   http://www.commoditytips.com/economic_calendar.php